Athletes · Coaches · Fans · Administrators

TrackFIT Member Access

Create a free TrackFIT TV account or sign in to access member-only content, complete rankings, events, reports, and TrackFIT features.

Create Free Account Sign In
Free account. No card required.
TRACKFIT · ATHLETE SCOUTING PROTOCOL

10 × 100m Repeat Sprint Endurance Challenge

Athlete: Tyler A. · Age 18 · 5′11″ · 165 lb

Ten 100-meter sprints with 2:00 rest between repetitions. A 1,000-meter total-work test of repeat-speed capacity, acceleration retention, and mechanical consistency.

Athlete performance assessment10 repetitions2:00 recoveryTrack · sprint endurance protocol
01 · TrackFIT performance intelligence

The four results that matter

Tyler recorded 10.81 seconds in his fastest 100m. His four performance results focus on single-race speed, while the 10-repetition average of 11.28 seconds shows his ability to sustain that speed across the challenge.

Recorded sprint
Today's Performance
10.81 sec
Fastest recorded 100m · repetition 1 of 10.
Immediate opportunity
Today's Potential
10.65 sec
Single-race potential through more efficient acceleration, reduced braking, and stronger sprint mechanics.
Development projection
6–18 Month Potential
10.10–10.20 sec
Single-race development potential with improved maximum velocity, propulsion efficiency, and speed retention.
Long-range performance
Lifetime Body Ceiling
9.90 sec
Long-term single-race potential as Tyler develops his maximum sprint speed, force transfer, and technical efficiency.

The four results assess Tyler’s single 100m performance and potential. His 11.28-second average across ten sprints is analyzed separately to identify opportunities in repeat-speed endurance.

02 · The performance, explained

At a glance

How quickly Tyler ran, and how consistently he could repeat that speed.

Fastest 100m
10.81 s
Rep 1
10-rep average
11.28 s
Mean of all 10 sprints
Slowest 100m
11.88 s
Rep 10
Best-to-slowest change
+1.07 s
Repeat-speed decline

Key finding: speed retention is the development opportunity

Tyler starts at 10.81 seconds and reaches 11.88 by rep 10. His acceleration segment (0–30m) shows the largest absolute slowdown, while the 60–100m segment also degrades. Improving repeatability could help preserve more of his initial speed later in the set.

03
TrackFIT™ performance intelligence

Movement Mechanics

Your movement pattern and the mechanics behind your result.

Fastest 100m
10.81 s

Opening repetition

Slowest 100m
11.88 s

Final repetition

Repeat speed decline
+1.07 s

Difference from rep 1 to rep 10

What happened across all 10 reps

100m time by repetition

Sprint Times100m completion time, seconds, repetitions 1 through 10. Exact numbers are provided in the tables below.10.711.011.311.712.012345678910Repetition100m time (s), rep 1: 10.81100m time (s), rep 2: 10.92100m time (s), rep 3: 11.01100m time (s), rep 4: 11.08100m time (s), rep 5: 11.19100m time (s), rep 6: 11.28100m time (s), rep 7: 11.41100m time (s), rep 8: 11.55100m time (s), rep 9: 11.71100m time (s), rep 10: 11.88

Rep time rises steadily from 10.81 to 11.88 seconds. The decline becomes more pronounced late in the set.

100m divided into three phases

0–30m30–60m60–100m
Phase SplitsSegment times, seconds, repetitions 1 through 10. Exact numbers are provided in the tables below.2.93.33.84.24.612345678910Repetition0–30m, rep 1: 4.050–30m, rep 2: 4.090–30m, rep 3: 4.120–30m, rep 4: 4.160–30m, rep 5: 4.200–30m, rep 6: 4.250–30m, rep 7: 4.310–30m, rep 8: 4.380–30m, rep 9: 4.440–30m, rep 10: 4.5230–60m, rep 1: 3.0130–60m, rep 2: 3.0430–60m, rep 3: 3.0730–60m, rep 4: 3.0930–60m, rep 5: 3.1230–60m, rep 6: 3.1630–60m, rep 7: 3.1930–60m, rep 8: 3.2230–60m, rep 9: 3.2630–60m, rep 10: 3.2960–100m, rep 1: 3.7560–100m, rep 2: 3.7960–100m, rep 3: 3.8260–100m, rep 4: 3.8360–100m, rep 5: 3.8760–100m, rep 6: 3.8760–100m, rep 7: 3.9160–100m, rep 8: 3.9560–100m, rep 9: 4.0160–100m, rep 10: 4.07

The 0–30m segment changes from 4.05 to 4.52 seconds. The 30–60m segment changes from 3.01 to 3.29 seconds, and the final 40m from 3.75 to 4.07 seconds.

Propulsion index

Propulsion IndexPropulsion index, thousands, repetitions 1 through 10. Exact numbers are provided in the tables below.10.410.711.111.511.812345678910RepetitionSum of per-contact force proxies, rep 1: 11.62Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 2: 11.74Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 3: 11.56Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 4: 11.68Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 5: 11.41Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 6: 11.18Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 7: 11.09Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 8: 10.86Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 9: 10.75Sum of per-contact force proxies, rep 10: 10.46

Propulsion index changes from 11,616 to 10,464 across reps 1–10. This index summarizes the change in propulsive output through the 10 repetitions.

Impact index

Impact IndexImpact index, thousands, repetitions 1 through 10. Exact numbers are provided in the tables below.29.830.130.330.630.912345678910RepetitionSum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 1: 30.49Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 2: 30.82Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 3: 30.42Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 4: 30.73Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 5: 30.36Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 6: 29.99Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 7: 30.27Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 8: 29.84Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 9: 30.24Sum of per-contact peak proxies, rep 10: 30.10

The peak-load index changes from 30,492 to 30,096. Changes in contact count and peak impact indicator contribute to the index.

Rep-by-rep breakdown

Sprint times and segment splits

Rep100m total0–30m30–60m60–100mRep grade
#110.81 s4.05 s3.01 s3.75 sA
#210.92 s4.09 s3.04 s3.79 sA
#311.01 s4.12 s3.07 s3.82 sB
#411.08 s4.16 s3.09 s3.83 sB
#511.19 s4.20 s3.12 s3.87 sB
#611.28 s4.25 s3.16 s3.87 sB
#711.41 s4.31 s3.19 s3.91 sC
#811.55 s4.38 s3.22 s3.95 sC
#911.71 s4.44 s3.26 s4.01 sC
#1011.88 s4.52 s3.29 s4.07 sC

Repetition grades: A · 11.00 seconds or faster; B · 11.01–11.35 seconds; C · slower than 11.35 seconds.

Modeled force proxies and foot contacts

RepContactsPeak impact proxy (lb)Propulsion proxy/contact (lb)Propulsion indexImpact index
#14469326411,61630,492
#24568526111,74530,825
#34567625711,56530,420
#44666825411,68430,728
#54666024811,40830,360
#64665224311,17829,992
#74764423611,09230,268
#84763523110,85729,845
#94863022410,75230,240
#104862721810,46430,096

TrackFIT propulsion and impact indexes combine the force profile with ground-contact counts for each repetition.

04
TrackFIT™ performance intelligence

Impact & Effort Forces

How your body applies useful effort and handles the demands of ground contact.

Effort Force retention across ten repetitions. Your first repetition shows the highest force output. Across ten 100m efforts, propulsive effort per contact falls while repeat times increase. Improving movement efficiency and posterior-chain endurance can help maintain useful Effort Force later in the session.
Effort per contact, rep 1
264 lb

Rep 10: 218 lb

Peak impact indicator, rep 1
693 lb

Rep 10: 627 lb

Force retention
82.6%

Rep 10 relative to rep 1

05
TrackFIT™ performance intelligence

Motion DNA™ & TrackFIT Score

Your individual movement signature, performance strengths and score profile.

Movement-performance profile

75 / 100
TrackFIT Motion DNA™ score

Acceleration retention is the clearest area to develop

Tyler scores highest in maximum velocity (82) and acceleration (78). Speed endurance (70) and repeat fitness (72) are his primary areas for improvement.

Acceleration
78
Maximum velocity
82
Speed endurance
70
Force retention
74
Repeat fitness
72
06
TrackFIT™ performance intelligence

What Closes the Gap

The physical and mechanical changes that can improve your result.

01 · Acceleration retention

Strengthen glute and hamstring coordination to preserve the initial 30m acceleration pattern in the later repetitions.

02 · Elastic force transfer

Improve foot and ankle stiffness and contact timing to retain more useful propulsive effort as sprint speed decreases.

03 · Posture under fatigue

Improve trunk and hip control to reduce late-sprint mechanics losses while maintaining a consistent left–right movement pattern.

07
TrackFIT™ performance intelligence

Performance Development Plan

Your next performance targets and priorities for the next assessment.

01 · Acceleration retention

Keep acceleration mechanics effective beyond the fifth repetition.

  • Twice weekly: 6 × (50m jog + 50m progressive acceleration at 95–98%) with 2:00 recovery. Target: final rep within 0.12 seconds of best.
  • Once weekly: resisted sled work, 8 × 50m at approximately 20–25% body weight, with full recovery and technique oversight.
  • Once weekly: 3 clusters of 3 × 20m, with 30 seconds between runs and 4:00 between clusters.

02 · Late-sprint mechanics

Improve mechanics and speed maintenance through the final 40 meters.

  • Once weekly: 5 × 150m around 92–95% effort, with 6–8 minutes recovery.
  • Twice weekly: wicket runs and flying 30m runs following a 30m build-up.
  • Twice weekly: low-volume pogo hops and rudiment hops, emphasizing contact quality.

03 · Efficiency under fatigue

Maintain posture and consistent contacts as fatigue develops.

  • Use side-view video to review hip position, trunk angle, and contact mechanics rather than assuming one fault causes another.
  • Twice weekly: posterior-chain strength and ankle stiffness work adapted to the athlete's training load.
  • Support high-quality sprint sessions with appropriate sleep, fueling, and recovery.
Average time
≤11.20 s
Best-to-slowest gap
≤0.75 s
Rep 8 target
≤11.25 s
Motion DNA score
80+
Additional Race Performance Projections

Projected race performances

Additional race-distance projections informed by Tyler’s sprint profile and fatigue pattern.

Projected 200m
21.80 s
TrackFIT race projection
Projected 400m
49.40 s
TrackFIT race projection
Projected 800m
2:01.5
TrackFIT race projection
Protocol rest
2:00
Between 100m repetitions

TRACKFIT™ PERFORMANCE INTELLIGENCE · Motion DNA™ Signature Tracking · 10 × 100m Scouting Protocol

Utility patent pending: U.S. Patent Application Nos. 19/714,450 and 19/714,471; claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/827,829.

© 2026 WITFL Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. TrackFIT™, Motion DNA™, associated reports, scoring systems, performance intelligence, and proprietary analytical methods are protected intellectual property. Reproduction, distribution, automated extraction, or use without written authorization is prohibited.